“Equality is the antithesis of entitlement.”

Equality is also the pretext of entitlement. Ironic, isn’t it? I prefer abandoning the platitude altogether; it’s a term that is too loaded with baggage.

As far as marriage, if your wife marries you for your money, then you have a problem - but then again, it’s society’s indoctrination of material goals that feeds this. You are so right: a real marriage based in love and held as sacred does not share the same issues you describe here.

I agree that boys should be educated and taught to avoid women who will sleep with them for material gain - and further to avoid sex outside marriage. Then they won’t fall into the trap of “buying sex” from these promiscuous women (one would hope).

The other side is to educate the young girls and get their heads straight - get them grounded - so they won’t seek out material things and use sex as a means to get the things they want. If they save themselves for a man who loves and appreciates them, they will be far better off in the long run.

Mackenzie’s dad has created a monster who will wreck many men’s lives. It should go without saying that her own life will also be one of constantly dissatisfied misery. The frightening thing is just how many more Mackenzies are being created out there.

I also think there is nothing wrong in using a pseudonym. I use my real name when it is necessary, such as corresponding directly with organisations from whom I expect a reply, and a pseudonym when I am commenting on blogs - for a good reason. Blogs are public forums and could be read by anyone on the planet, including nutters of all shapes and sizes. If any of them decide they don’t like me and would like to know who I am, where I live and what family I have, then I am certainly not going to help them by giving them a real name to start with. I guess that is the main reason why so many others remain anonymous or use an avatar. It’s standard practice, and doesn’t necessarily mean nobody has the courage of their convictions. Plenty of bloggers are just letting off steam or play-acting, but there are also some serious people behind the masks, doing seriously important work. It is the message that counts, not the identity of the guy delivering it. If what is say is either right or wrong, it remains right or wrong regardless of whether I call myself Old Mother Riley or Donald Duck.

I am also not your enemy! I think you are doing great work and deserve more attention than you seem to be getting here.

Stunts are a waste. Awareness without results is meaningless.

However I will take issue with you on a couple of points. I do believe there is considerable value in “complaining under aliases on blogs” - otherwise I would not be doing it myself!

Blogs can be a vital way of keeping in touch with news and events, encountering other people of a like mind and exchanging ideas. It can be a lifeline for men who feel alone and alienated in a male-hating environment. Of course, you are right in that just moaning does not get you very far; but helping to educate others, hearing alternative views and getting information about events are positive results that can come from contributing to blogs. Where else do you think I heard about you? I live in the UK, and I would never have heard of you if I had relied on the UK mass media to tell me about your views. We have feminist censorship over here, too. But they can’t censor the internet and men’s rights blogs, which is how I found you.

Also the “counterproductive stunts” are not counterproductive if they grab headlines and highlight injustices.

Before there can be any effective action, there has to be awareness of the cause, and both the blogs and the stunts raise and increase awareness. They represent a first step from which others can follow. But you are right in that the other practical, active steps then have to be taken.

It’s just the same as trying to decide who is responsible for that car wrapped around the tree in broad daylight, on a dry road, and with no other traffic around. Is it the woman sitting in the driver’s seat, or the man she left behind at the kerbside three miles back? Obama, the courts, the media, the government, the feminist movement and a huge slice of the female population apparently think it is the man.

How do you cut through such breathtaking ignorance, or wilful refusal to accept the reality that is staring them in the face?

This brings to mind an interview I watched with Barbara Walters and Mary Kay Laturno, the Seattle teacher who’s famous for “falling in love” with her 13-year old boy student. The interview made me want to vomit so bad, I hadn’t been that sick to my stomach since my last YegerMeister hangver! She played the victim, like they all do, claiming the real perpetrator was her lousy no-good husband, and that the boy gave her solace and a sense of “connectedness” that her jerk husband couldn’t give.

I wonder of a male teacher who had sex with his 13-year old girl student could get an interview with Barbara Walters. I wonder if he could use his lousy marriage to a Merchant Maureen wife as an excuse for getting solace and “connectedness” from the female child. What do you say? Do yaa think???

What I want to know is, how did we get this way? How did America become so feminized, so brainwashed and indoctrinated by feminism. You don’t even hear the big conservative voices like Rush Limbaugh, Sean Hannity, Tony Snow and Bill O’Riley challenge feminism anymore. They just accept it as status quo!

More power to you, Marc Rudov. You have the guts and backbone to stand up against this feminist monster in the “politically correct” age we live in. Keep up the good work!

Mr. Rudov, isn’t “Ron Paul has no chance” a poor reason for not choosing him?

For one thing, his numbers have not fallen off even after losing as recent GOP primaries show; for another, he has gotten money for a couple local politicians to reflect his beliefs; and finally, not too many people would have bet money on the Boston Tea Party Indians either. Fighting a losing fight for good is still better than winning the fight for evil, isn’t it?

After all, what is your blog about? Being on the winning team? Come on, follow your convictions. If you have solid reasons not to like Ron Paul, stand on those, not behind the pansy excuse you used.