Recruiting Merchant Maureens
by Marc H. RudovShock and Awe
Whether a man purchases sex on a date, in marriage, or through an escort service, the dispensing woman is a prostitute, a merchant. Ashley Youmans, aka Ashley Alexandra Dupré, aka Kristen — famous whore of Eliot Spitzer — earns between $3K to $5K per hour spreading her legs. Heather Mills McCartney, while married to Sir Paul, earned $33,562 per day spreading her legs. Had Heather collected the $250M divorce settlement she was seeking, instead of the $49M she got, her daily fee would have tallied $171K! Poor tramp will have to make do with the lower sum. So, if merchant Kristen can turn six tricks per day, at her highest fee, she can join merchant Heather’s league: The Merchant Maureens.
Is your woman a Merchant Maureen? If so, don’t forget one minor detail: you recruited her. Why? Because you don’t know how to sail your ship in her waters without paying a fee. You didn’t even know that it’s possible. You assume that bribing your way through her canal is the rule. She knows that about you and charges accordingly, based on the value of your cargo.
You cannot claim shock and awe at her mercenary behavior. She signaled it in your first conversation — right about the time you bragged about your luxury car (your cargo) and offered to buy her something or take her somewhere. Dummy. In tennis, the first time you display a weak backhand, your opponent begins hitting lots of shots to your backhand. Duh! Likewise, Merchant Maureens sense your manhood insecurity — money is your manhood — and sell sex to you, charging you for passage. And, once you acquiesce to this prostitution, you’re booked and hooked — forever.
Learned Behavior
Men learn this behavior in childhood. Every time a female teacher is caught having sex with a male student, most people think the boy is “lucky” to get laid. Yet, when a male teacher is in the same situation with a female student, she’s a victim (the favorite female word), and he’s a predator — a perverse double standard. What happens if the female teacher spreads an STD to the boy or gets pregnant? His life is ruined. But, nobody cares — he’s a male; he’s disposable.
Society has total disregard for the psychological pains of boys and doesn’t even think boys feel anything at all. Boys are children, not adults. Such an attitude is precisely why men behave as Eliot Spitzer did — with self-loathing and immaturity about women and sex. Boys who feel “lucky” to get laid grow up with low self-esteem and become men who feel “lucky” — and will pay any price — to get laid. That’s why men are attracted to Merchant Maureens, why Merchant Maureens exist.
The NoNonsense Bottom Line
I receive dozens of e-mails every day from men whose lives have been ruined by Merchant Maureens. These men all say the same thing: “Marc, if I had known about you 20 years ago, I wouldn’t be in this mess.” We all learn tough lessons. But, what amazes me is the number of men, in 2008, who will ignore the severe weather warnings of the high seas — will put their fortunes and careers on the line — to pursue the Heathers and Kristens of this world, to recruit Merchant Maureens.
If parents don’t start imbuing their sons with self-respect and educating them about women — instead of perpetuating the lie from their own lives about female sexuality — boys and men will know women only as whores and will continue buying drinks, dinners, jewelry, vacations, cars, and houses for sex that should be free. When men and women respect and like each other, sex is never about money.
They won’t admit it, but many parents are raising future Kristens and Heathers — Merchant Maureens — to scour the globe in search of self-loathing, insecure men who will finance their lifestyles. We all see this happening, even in the homes of our best friends. Merchant Maureens are everywhere, as present in escort services as they are during ladies’ night at your local pub. The question is, Will YOU be recruiting them?
About the Author
Marc H. Rudov is an internationally recognized radio/TV personality and author of 70+ articles and the books Under the Clitoral Hood: How to Crank Her Engine Without Cash, Booze, or Jumper Cables (ISBN 9780974501727), and The Man’s No-Nonsense Guide to Women: How to Succeed in Romance on Planet Earth (ISBN 0974501719). Mr. Rudov is a regular guest on Fox News Channel’s Your World with Neil Cavuto and The O’Reilly Factor.
Rudov’s books, articles, blog, and podcasts are available at TheNoNonsenseMan.com.
Copyright © 2008 by Marc H. Rudov. All rights reserved.
This entry was posted
on Tuesday, March 18th, 2008 at 12:18 pm and is filed under TNNM, Vox Populi.
You can follow any responses to this entry through the RSS 2.0 feed.
You can leave a response, or trackback from your own site.
| 
Print This Post
March 30th, 2008 at 6:13 pm
I have been married to two Merchant Maureens. Women who are never happy with anything they have. They always want more and never give anything back in return, but grief! Thankfully, after my two divorces, my current girlfriend of four plus years is not a Merchant Maureen. I take her out, but she also takes me out. When we go on vacations, she always pays her own pay, and sometimes more. I don’t feel bad about it at all because that is the only way I can enjoy spending time with her. It would be impossible for me to pay the expenses of both of us. I agree that peer relationships are much better for couples.
I agree that it is high time for women to be punished when they have sex with young boys, especially when female teachers have sex with their students. If a man did the same thing to a willing girl, he would be crucified. I also don’t understand why when two drunken people have sex that the woman can get up in the morning and charge rape if she made a mistake. How come the woman is always the one that can use drunkeness as an excuse not to give consent? Did it ever occur to anyone that the man might have been too drunk to consent as well? Men and women both should be held accountable for their actions, even when they are drunk.
I also wanted to add that Eliot Spitzer is a disgrace. As are all men that frequent prostitutes. I believe that prostitutes are just plain filthy. Why would a man want to pay to have sex with a woman that has been inseminated by no telling how many men during the past week, or even that day? If nothing else, he better not kiss her. Never know where her mouth has been!
I saw your debate with Lis Wiehl the other day and she looked like a fool! Several times she disagreed with you then she turned right around and repeated exactly what you said! I absolutely have lost any respect for any of her opinions. She simply cannot even consider listening to another point of view. I also saw your debate with Laura and was shocked that Laura would be in disagreement about peer relationships. I guess she only favors personal responsibility for men, not women. I have agreed with her most of the time. But now I know she is just another Merchant Maureen! Again I lost a lot of respect for her opinion.
It was during that interview with Laura that I decided to visit your website. You are right on and I agree with you 100%.
April 3rd, 2008 at 5:19 pm
I’ve always argued that our current dating protocol is a legalized form of prostitution. If a man covers all dating related expenses he might end up getting laid (WTF).
Bottom line, equality should apply to both privileges and responsibilities.
I commend you for speaking out…
June 24th, 2008 at 10:46 am
You mention boys getting “lucky” to have sex with their teachers.
This brings to mind an interview I watched with Barbara Walters and Mary Kay Laturno, the Seattle teacher who’s famous for “falling in love” with her 13-year old boy student. The interview made me want to vomit so bad, I hadn’t been that sick to my stomach since my last YegerMeister hangver! She played the victim, like they all do, claiming the real perpetrator was her lousy no-good husband, and that the boy gave her solace and a sense of “connectedness” that her jerk husband couldn’t give.
I wonder of a male teacher who had sex with his 13-year old girl student could get an interview with Barbara Walters. I wonder if he could use his lousy marriage to a Merchant Maureen wife as an excuse for getting solace and “connectedness” from the female child. What do you say? Do yaa think???
What I want to know is, how did we get this way? How did America become so feminized, so brainwashed and indoctrinated by feminism. You don’t even hear the big conservative voices like Rush Limbaugh, Sean Hannity, Tony Snow and Bill O’Riley challenge feminism anymore. They just accept it as status quo!
More power to you, Marc Rudov. You have the guts and backbone to stand up against this feminist monster in the “politically correct” age we live in. Keep up the good work!
August 26th, 2008 at 4:13 pm
One thing that has an effect is society’s indoctrination that it is ok to have sex while you are dating. If dating was just that: dating, and sex was taken out of the picture, then “paying for sex” simply would not be an issue. Dating is to get to know someone. Marriage is after you know and love them and then sex is great. Before hand leads into all sorts of traps, like what you describe here.
As far as marriage, if your wife marries you for your money, then you have a problem – but then again, it’s society’s indoctrination of material goals that feeds this. You are so right: a real marriage based in love and held as sacred does not share the same issues you describe here.
I agree that boys should be educated and taught to avoid women who will sleep with them for material gain – and further to avoid sex outside marriage. Then they won’t fall into the trap of “buying sex” from these promiscuous women (one would hope).
The other side is to educate the young girls and get their heads straight – get them grounded – so they won’t seek out material things and use sex as a means to get the things they want. If they save themselves for a man who loves and appreciates them, they will be far better off in the long run.