Virginia Hates Dads

You can level many accusations at John F. Kennedy, our 35th president. But, there is one self-evident truth you cannot deny: JFK was a loving and doting father. You can feel it by looking at the many photos of him with his children.

I was in elementary school when Kennedy was assassinated, and that horrible incident made an indelible impression on me — and on the whole country. Even then, I enjoyed watching Caroline and John-John run to greet JFK exiting his helicopter on the White House lawn. There is nothing like the sight of kids and their father sharing mutual love, something critical for the family — and for our country’s bedrock.

So, it is with great pain that I watch the state of Virginia destroying that critical father-child bond by callously vilifying fathers, presuming them to be pedophiles. Not only is such a campaign — funded by Virginia taxpayers — preposterous, outrageous, and immoral, it is unconstitutional. Furthermore, it hurts children by teaching them to fear their fathers and avoid seeking their help and counsel. It engenders a culture where little girls grow up as misandrists and little boys as self-hating shells of human beings.

Virginia’s hatefully indoctrinated children eventually will become the next generation of man-hating cops, judges, senators, district attorneys, mayors, governors, presidential candidates, bureaucrats, journalists, psychiatrists, teachers, movie and TV producers, and parents. Intergenerational misandry will fester like its anti-Semitic and racist cousins.

Would Virginia post highway billboards of Muslims, exhorting Virginians to report them as potential terrorists? Never. Would Virginia post billboards of Hispanics, rallying the townspeople to identify them to ICE as illegal aliens and criminals? Never in a million years — Virginia is a sanctuary state. Yet, Virginia Governor Tim Kaine can sleep at night knowing that his director of sexual and domestic-violence prevention, Rebecca Odor, is incriminating innocent men.

Below is the State Seal of Virginia, with the Latin motto “sic semper tyrannis” (”thus always to tyrants”), adopted in 1776. The two figures, both dressed as warriors, are portraying the motto — the woman, Virtue (naturally), represents Virginia; the man, holding a scourge and chain, is a tyrant (naturally), with his fallen crown nearby. Given its officially negative depiction of men, is anyone surprised by Virginia’s anti-father campaign?

Misandry is both politically correct and institutionalized in Virgina, as it is in all of the American Gynocracy. Anyone who accepts this hatred in silence, whether living inside or outside Virginia, is anti-male, anti-child, and anti-family.

It dawned on me that, were JFK alive today and living in Virginia, he would be a suspected pedophile. Any Virginian, according to Tim Kaine and Rebecca Odor, would be compelled, upon seeing this father alone with his daughter, to report him to the “StopItNow” hotline. In fact, I can envision a Virginia billboard, along the roadside of I-95 in Richmond, showing JFK and daughter Caroline like this:

The NoNonsense Bottom Line

There are those who believe that abusing fathers, Virginia style, is the way to stop child abuse. First, because mothers, according to the US Department of Health & Human Services, are the champion child abusers, vilifying fathers is numerically nuts. Second, it is illegal: the US Constitution guarantees due process, equal protection, and presumption of innocence. But, as we have seen over and over again in America (think Duke University Lacrosse scandal), our so-called “justice” system presumes men guilty and invents laws on the fly to bash them.

Every country’s fate is tied to its ability to abide by the rule of law and to respect its citizens equally. Nazi Germany proved that. Venezuela, under dictator Hugo Chavez, is proving that now. The way to stop child abuse is to prosecute child abusers, using due process — not to unjustly and nefariously condemn men. Unless America begins valuing men, its fate is nihilistic.

Was JFK a pedophile? Yes, according to Virginia Governor Kaine.

About the Author

Marc H. Rudov is an internationally recognized author of 60+ articles and the books Under the Clitoral Hood: How to Crank Her Engine Without Cash, Booze, or Jumper Cables (ISBN 9780974501727), and The Man’s No-Nonsense Guide to Women: How to Succeed in Romance on Planet Earth (ISBN 0974501719).

Rudov’s books, articles, blog, and podcasts are available at TheNoNonsenseMan.com.

Copyright © 2007 by Marc H. Rudov. All rights reserved.

Marc Rudov to Appear

on

The KTLA Morning Show

Will Expose Women’s Manipulative Double Standards in Relationships

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

Read the News Release

http://biz.yahoo.com/iw/070822/0293510.html

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

www.TheNoNonsenseMan.com

“Pro-Family” Politicians

In my last article, “Hillary Cannot Be President,” I asserted that no Oval Office contender — Republican or Democrat — represents the interests of men. The punishment for ignoring the male half of the population should be total failure on the campaign trail. If one of them succeeds in reaching the White House, however, it will be because men silently and sheepishly allowed it.

While you’ll hear politicians spout “pro-family” views, their speeches lack any mention of the father as an integral member of the family. Why? The feminarcissists have succeeded, to the detriment of society, in redefining the family. Traditionally, the family comprised a father and mother living together with their children. No longer. Government-encouraged divorces and out-of-wedlock births have changed that.

The new definition of the family, thanks to the feminarcissists and the Congressional eunuchs who kowtow to them, is a mother living with her children, collecting payments from a deposed, alienated father. So, when you hear a politician mention “family,” you’ll know he means the mother-centric model.

If we use the Solar System as a metaphor for the mother-centric family, Mom, about whom everything and everybody revolves, is Ms. Sunshine. And Dad? Dad is Uranus. Even though the gravitational force where Dad resides is weak, the Solar System Powers still found a way to suck from him alimony, child support, and his dignity — at warp speed. Yes, Dad is Uranus. Does anybody doubt this?

In our country, it is politically acceptable to teach children to fear — even hate — men and fathers, as the state of Virginia does. How did Clinton, Guiliani, Edwards, Richardson, Romney, Obama, Thompson, and McCain respond to this vicious, vile Virginia campaign? Total silence — even though the US Department of Health & Human Services, in 2000 through 2005, reported that mothers commit 40% of child abuse while fathers commit 18%. Do these candidates represent the family? Hell no! Hating and ignoring fathers is tantamount to hating children and the family. Which family-hater is your candidate?

Becoming Uranus

A man is not Uranus at birth. No, he works diligently, and often unknowingly, at it. The education begins in his childhood home. Then, he associates with people — men and women — who reinforce that males have no value or worth. So, how does a man know that he is becoming or has become Uranus? Here are seven tell-tale signs:

1. He automatically reaches for the check when he dines with her
2. He buys an extravagant engagement ring and kneels when proposing to her — because he is beneath her, and it is “her” day
3. He considers his own wedding “her” day, a day that she will remember forever
4. He believes that keeping her happy and comfortable is his lot in life
5. He sleeps on the couch, in another room, or in a hotel after arguing with her — because he’s the culprit, no matter what
6. He wants to “do the right thing” in a divorce by giving her the house, the SUV, the kids, and the largest possible financial settlement
7. He knowingly votes for political candidates who hate or ignore men.

The NoNonsense Bottom Line

Every man must stand up, reassert himself in society, and take the 2008 election seriously. He must acknowledge that women are equal to men, and he must hold them to it. He must demand the restoration of his civil rights. He must categorically reject the feminarcissistic, mother-centric model of the family and reject every person — in his personal life, in his professional life, and on the political stage — who supports that model.

Every man must decide, today, that — until our state and federal governments reverse direction to recognize fathers as equally important to mothers, by removing all legislative and judicial advantages granted to women — he will boycott marriage, cohabitation, and procreation. He must make it known to every presidential aspirant, and every woman, that ignoring the interests of men will lead to failure.

So, what will you do? It’s your choice. It’s your life. It’s Uranus.

About the Author

Marc H. Rudov is an internationally recognized author of 60+ articles and the books Under the Clitoral Hood: How to Crank Her Engine Without Cash, Booze, or Jumper Cables (ISBN 9780974501727), and The Man’s No-Nonsense Guide to Women: How to Succeed in Romance on Planet Earth (ISBN 0974501719).

Rudov’s books, articles, blog, and podcasts are available at TheNoNonsenseMan.com.

Copyright © 2007 by Marc H. Rudov. All rights reserved.

The Unfairer Sex

Hillary Clinton isn’t qualified to become our next president. Why? Because she exclusively represents a gender that doesn’t want or believe in equality. She promotes herself as a champion for women, and, therefore, doesn’t represent men. This biased leader of the “unfairer” sex — a gender always in search of special rights and privileges — doesn’t have what it takes to lead our nation.

Governor of New Mexico, Bill Richardson, also can’t be president. He launched his Women for Richardson effort with pledges to support pay equity, provide limited Social Security credit for family leave, and appoint judges who would uphold abortion rights. Said Richardson: “This is not a constituency issue. This is not an issue of women being a special interest. Women are the majority in this country. What I’m doing here is addressing the interests of the majority.”

Mature, emancipated, fair-minded adults take umbrage at condescension and handouts. But, women are not taking umbrage. Why not? They don’t really want equality. Women don’t grasp that they diminish themselves by seeking and accepting special treatment, from politicians or employers or boyfriends or husbands. It suits women to feign weakness and fragility — because wimpy men fall for it. Alas, a woman who plays the victim card will indeed experience the occasional victory, but it will be Phyrric: she will lose the respect of others and of herself.

Women enjoy double standards and aren’t satisfied having the upper hand in the laws governing reproduction, safe haven, abortion, maternity fraud, paternity fraud, divorce, custody, alimony, child support, assault, battery, restraining orders, domestic violence, rape, and presumption of innocence. They want more, and they get more. Gains in rights for women mean losses in rights for men. It’s a zero-sum game. Equality be damned. The Constitution be damned.

Name one presidential candidate who’s promised to prosecute the next woman who falsely accuses a man of rape. You can’t. Remember Crystal Gail Mangum, who feloniously accused three Duke University lacrosse athletes of rape? They were totally innocent, and yet she’s a free woman. Outrageous. Which presidential candidate promised to prosecute women like Kim Basinger who alienate children from their fathers? None. Which candidate promised to prosecute Katie Couric for slapping a male subordinate in the workplace? None. Not one presidential candidate gives a damn about or represents men. America is a gynocracy.

Princess Academy

What is the genesis of our gynocracy? Women aren’t born believing they’re entitled; they learn entitlement at Princess Academy, through a lifetime of courses. These courses are available within and without the family — in school, on TV, on the radio, in the movies, in singles bars, in magazines, and in “female-ly” courts. They are offered to grown women, as part of continuing education, and to little girls, as the introduction to vaginal manipulation.

In July, NBC teamed up with Money magazine to teach women how to land billionaires. And, within the past week or so, MSN Money offered a female-taught tutorial to men on how to get a second date by paying for the first one. Are men stupid enough to justify and validate these courses? You bet. Otherwise, the “madrasahs of misandry” wouldn’t exist. And, they will pay handsomely for their stupidity. After all, it’s no coincidence that “court” is at the root of courting and courtesan.

Despite graduating college at a 33% higher rate than men; despite earning more money than men in New York City, Chicago, and Dallas; despite owning the preponderance of rights and privileges in all of America; women perceive themselves as the downtrodden. This is a vestigial emotion from the days when daddy never said no.

Women protested when ladies’ nights were outlawed in California, Hawaii, Iowa, New Jersey, and Pennsylvania, and are outraged that the same fate might befall New York. Princess Academy graduates like Maureen Dowd — who penned Are Men Necessary? — reject equality, proving that feminism is a hypocritical joke.

Princess Academy has a panoply of courses for little girls, too. SalesGenie, an online purveyor of sales leads, is the latest advertiser to teach that fathers (men) have all the financial responsibility. In a new TV commercial that CBS showed frequently this past weekend during the 89th PGA Championship in Tulsa, Oklahoma, a little girl laments that her father, a salesman, didn’t make very much money last year. But, mommy saved him by buying a subscription to SalesGenie. Now, the little girl tells us, her daddy can get more sales leads, close more business — and make more money.

Is it inappropriate for a little girl to be involved in her father’s finances? Yes. Is it perverse to use a little girl to manipulate men into buying a financial product? Yes. Is it strange that women, who also are sales executives, aren’t targeted customers in this SalesGenie spot? Yes. What do children think when they watch this sexist SalesGenie commerical? That men have one purpose in life: being the default providers for women.

Damsel in Distress

If women are fragile, dainty, delicate, entitled princesses, they’re unfit to be president. If women need special rights and privileges, they’re inferior and unfit to be president. If they don’t mind watching their sons, fathers, brothers, husbands, boyfriends, cousins, uncles, and friends lose civil rights, they’re unfit to be president. Alas, many men, in the name of political correctness and notwithstanding the above, will vote for Hillary, and they should be ashamed of themselves.

Until women act equal, they aren’t equal, and we cannot elect them to the top job of our country. How will we know when women are equal? When ladies’ night is outlawed in every state and no woman complains. When women stop demanding and expecting to be wined & dined on dates. When articles about how to marry billionaires cease to exist. When alimony is abolished. When mothers stop getting automatic child custody. When unwed mothers are no longer entitled to child support. When women who falsely accuse men of rape are imprisoned for 25 years. When politicians no longer have special campaign platforms and promises for women.

Newsflash: Hell will freeze over before women act like equals. Why? Because the typical woman is insecure and, regardless of her education or occupation or age or wealth, likes to be a damsel in distress; the typical man is insecure and, regardless of his education or occupation or age or wealth, feels compelled to rescue her. Ultimately, however, he will pay a huge price for his insecurity: loss of cash, kids, house, and civil rights.

The NoNonsense Bottom Line

It’s shameful enough that male candidates are pandering and condescending to women, totally ignoring men in the process. But, Hillary’s candidacy is doubly bad because she’s a woman running as the “champion for women.” Adult women in a gynocracy don’t need a champion. A genuine, fair, balanced president must be the champion for all citizens. Hillary cannot offer this, and Hillary cannot be our president.

When women demonstrate that they are fully equal to men — take the same lumps, pay the same prices, and suffer the same consequences in life as men — then they will be qualified to occupy the Oval Office. Until then, they can keep seeking special treatment and keep getting disrespect.

About the Author

Marc H. Rudov is an internationally recognized author of 60+ articles and the books Under the Clitoral Hood: How to Crank Her Engine Without Cash, Booze, or Jumper Cables (ISBN 9780974501727), and The Man’s No-Nonsense Guide to Women: How to Succeed in Romance on Planet Earth (ISBN 0974501719).

Rudov’s books, articles, blog, and podcasts are available at TheNoNonsenseMan.com.

Copyright © 2007 by Marc H. Rudov. All rights reserved.

Sugar & Spice

The basic premise of all my writings about men and women is that they are essentially the same and have the same desires, but that they are socialized differently and programmed for conflict. To wit: as children, we learn the gender myth that boys want sex and girls want relationships. Not only is that myth patently false, but my book, Under the Clitoral Hood, goes a step further: it demonstrates that women are more sexual than men.

Teaching kids gender myths ultimately leads to dysfunctional relationships, an intolerable divorce rate, and fatherless homes. It also encourages society — especially feminists, journalists, university presidents, lawmakers, policemen, district attorneys, and judges — to presumptively categorize men as predators and women as victims.

In the past week, we saw Lindsay Lohan arrested again, Nicole Richey going to jail, and Paris Hilton losing her inheritance for sullying the family name. We read about Mary Byrne Smith, who ran away from her family and took an assumed name, causing many to unfairly suspect her husband of foul play. We also read about a disturbing tendency of some miltary wives to abuse and neglect their children when their husbands are fighting in battle. What about sugar and spice and everything nice? It’s nonsense. Wake up.

Libido & Ladies’ Night

According to a recent study at the University of Texas, US college-aged men and women agree on their top reasons for having sex: attraction, desire for physical pleasure, and “it feels good.” The results of this study, in which 20 of the top 25 reasons given for having sex were the same for men and women, were published in the August edition of Archives of Sexual Behavior.

“The more we look, the more we find similarity,” said Dr. Irwin Goldstein, director of sexual medicine at Alvarado Hospital in San Diego. Goldstein, who was not part of Meston’s study, said the Texas research made a lot of sense and adds to growing evidence that the vaunted differences in the genders may only be among people with sexual problems.

The myth about sexual behavior has fostered a disappearing, sexist practice in many bars around the country: ladies’ night. New York attorney Roy Den Hollander has filed a class action against certain Manhattan nightclubs for “invidious discrimination” against men in their policies for admitting women. Hollander alleges that the clubs are violating the 14th Amendment’s guarantee of equal protection under the law, and, in addition to declaratory relief, he is seeking nominal damages and an injunction to halt the nightclubs’ practice of admitting women at a lower price than men.

Ladies’ nights are illegal; they already are outlawed in California, Hawaii, Iowa, New Jersey, and Pennsylvania. Women who drink for free prove they aren’t equal to men and don’t want to be equal to men. On July 31, 2007, Lis Wiehl and Megyn Kelly — both lawyers — told Bill O’Reilly, host of Fox News Channel’s The O’Reilly Factor, that, if Hollander prevails in his lawsuit, they won’t be showing up at any more bars. Bingo. If men are stupid enough, ladies will own every night and every day.

Why do ladies’ nights exist? Because men don’t get women and don’t require much of them, either. Worse, they think little of themselves. Men know little about the female libido and, therefore, don’t realize that booze is not required for sexual leverage. As I’ve stated ad nauseam: women do not get sexually aroused because of cash or booze. Men mistakenly think that, because women accept cash and booze, it equates to sexual arousal. Wrong. Unfortunately, ignorance is a stronger and more-enduring force than change.

Last week, I appeared on Maxim Radio’s Covino & Rich Show, on Sirius Satellite. I discussed the stupidity and danger of mixing booze and babes. Stupid because it is compensation for lack of skill. Dangerous because rape laws allow women to accuse men of incapacitating them with alcohol. Despite the shocking calls from men who were destroyed by women using the booze excuse to falsely accuse them of rape, at least half of the callers were outraged at me. I ruined their day.

One caller, a newly minted lawyer from New Jersey, told me that, if he doesn’t ply Manhattan women with alcohol, they’ll think him a loser. It’s all part of the game, he explained. Really? Newsflash, pal: you have it exactly backwards. The more money you spend on a woman, the more she’ll think you’re a loser. And, she’ll think this while taking your money!

The NoNonsense Bottom Line

In January 2007, AOL and Woman’s Day magazine teamed up to survey 3,000 married women. Results: more than half probably wouldn’t marry their husbands again, and 33% definitely wouldn’t marry their husbands again. Also, more than 75 percent fantasize about men other than their husbands, and 39 percent admitted to constantly flirting. These are alimony and child-support checks waiting to happen.

Why do these unfulfilled marriages occur? It’s very simple: Men wine & dine women, and women go along with it. Women are not turned on by these guys. But, their mothers taught them to marry providers. So, they bypass the men they really want and marry the men who please their mothers. After popping out some kids and purchasing the house, the unfulfilled wife divorces her husband, takes the house, the cash, and the kids, and then starts dating the men who really turn her on.

To get women, men must “get” women. Women like sex and are more sexual than men. Use this knowledge to your advantage, and stop operating from a point of weakness and ignorance. If you wine & dine women, it proves that you don’t “get” women. You think you will get them, but it will be temporary. In fact, they will get you.

About the Author

Marc H. Rudov is an internationally recognized author of 60+ articles and the books Under the Clitoral Hood: How to Crank Her Engine Without Cash, Booze, or Jumper Cables (ISBN 9780974501727), and The Man’s No-Nonsense Guide to Women: How to Succeed in Romance on Planet Earth (ISBN 0974501719).

Rudov’s books, articles, blog, and podcasts are available at TheNoNonsenseMan.com.

Copyright © 2007 by Marc H. Rudov. All rights reserved.