Will Anyone Say No to Women?
by Marc H. RudovBehavior Without Borders
The Christian Science Monitor recently ran an eye-popping article about the latest outrageous trend at America’s gynoversities: on-campus housing, child care, and counseling for unwed mothers and their children. This is Title IX run amok. Who is going to pay for this?
With all seriousness, the CSM article actually described the following scenario: Women now outnumber men in colleges and universities. But, for those with young children, the path to a degree — and self-sufficiency — is often blocked by two obstacles: housing and child care. Blocked? Self-sufficiency? Well, I am blocked from becoming a self-sufficient billionaire because nobody will hand me a billion dollars.
With the exception of Paris Hilton, who soon must serve a 45-day jail sentence for violating her license suspension, our society just cannot say no girls and women. Anything they want, they get. To the point: most glitterati predict that Hilton’s jail term will add to her allure. And, people wonder why the out-of-wedlock birthrate, which averages 37% across all demographics, is constantly rising.
Marilyn Gardner, a staff writer for the Christian Science Monitor, described the plight of Yissy Perez, who earned her civil-engineering degree on the campus of Tufts University in Medford, MA, while her daughter, now 22 months old, stayed miles away in Lawrence, MA, with her grandmother.
Perez’s beef (beef!!!) was that Tufts didn’t offer living accommodations for unwed mothers and illegitimate children. “I only get to see her on weekends,” Perez says. “It’s very hard for me.”
Very hard for you? Why is your self-made problem — your inability to control your reproductive system, your unwillingness to make wise choices — anybody else’s concern? It isn’t. But, the American Gynocracy, which has no problem wrongly accusing men of rape, cannot deny women any wish, allow them to feel any pressure, or permit them to be inconvenienced in any way.
As I wrote in “Playing Abortion Chess,” no American politician can get elected, and no US Supreme Court nominee can become a jurist, without first pledging support for Roe v. Wade, as if abortion is the number-one issue of women. It isn’t — otherwise, the out-of-wedlock birthrate would be zero.
Little girls grow up seeing men harshly treated or ignored, while women receive passes at every turn. They learn about out-of-wedlock pregnancy and child support, and witness relatives creating baby showers without ever attending weddings. This is the new America, folks, where secular progressives don’t want geographical or behavioral borders.
The NoNonsense Bottom Line
The reality is that nobody will say no to women. What used to bring shame now brings fame. The anything-goes mentality permeates society and wreaks anarchy, and there is no end in sight. American girls see a straight path of irresponsibility and entitlement from childhood to adulthood — from outlandish sweet-16 parties to automatic child support to special gynoversity housing.
Meanwhile, boys and men are being increasingly marginalized. I believe we are headed for a deeply divided society in which the only way for boys and men to survive — if they really want to — is to live apart from women, to attend all-male highschools and universities. Otherwise, they might as well go work for the City of San Francisco, which grants them the right to become women, free of charge.
About the Author
Marc H. Rudov is an internationally recognized author of 50+ articles and the books Under the Clitoral Hood: How to Crank Her Engine Without Cash, Booze, or Jumper Cables (ISBN 9780974501727), and The Man’s No-Nonsense Guide to Women: How to Succeed in Romance on Planet Earth (ISBN 0974501719).
Rudov’s books, articles, blog, and podcasts are available at TheNoNonsenseMan.com.
Copyright © 2007 by Marc H. Rudov. All rights reserved.
May 10th, 2007 at 9:29 am
What gets me is that everyone has a “poor girl” attitude in regards to unwed mothers. The responsibility to use contraception should be weighed equally on the future mother and father.
Women want to be spoonfed their rights just because they play the victim card and unfortunately in a society that favors mothers this WILL generate change. Women will get what they want if they voice their opinions loud enough.
The most interesting thing about the article is that there is mention of a custodial father, but I’m sure that’s only to keep the article “PC”. He is not named and gets one small sentence: “Oh, and there’s a custodial father too”.
Keep up the great writing Marc!