You're in No Nonsense Territory





MailingListButton03.jpg




Archives

  • November 2009
  • October 2009
  • September 2009
  • August 2009
  • July 2009
  • June 2009
  • May 2009
  • April 2009
  • March 2009
  • February 2009
  • January 2009
  • December 2008
  • November 2008
  • October 2008
  • September 2008
  • August 2008
  • June 2008
  • May 2008
  • April 2008
  • March 2008
  • February 2008
  • December 2007
  • November 2007
  • September 2007
  • August 2007
  • July 2007
  • June 2007
  • May 2007
  • April 2007
  • March 2007
  • February 2007
  • January 2007
  • December 2006
  • November 2006
  • October 2006
  • September 2006
  • August 2006
  • July 2006
  • June 2006
  • May 2006
  • April 2006
  • March 2006
  • February 2006
  • January 2006
  • December 2005
  • November 2005
  • October 2005
  • August 2005
  • July 2005
  • June 2005
  • May 2005
  • April 2005
  • March 2005
  • February 2005
  • January 2005
  • December 2004
  • November 2004
  • April 13th, 2007

    The Sexism of Imus and Nifong

    by Marc H. Rudov

    Built for Sacrifice

    The thoughtless, sexist, unconstrained words of veteran broadcaster Don Imus and North Carolina prosecutor Mike Nifong produced two uncannily juxtaposed events during this monumental week in American history.

    First, North Carolina Attorney General Roy Cooper ended an unjustified, fraudulent rape case by exonerating and pronouncing innocent the wrongly accused Duke University lacrosse players. District Attorney Mike Nifong, whom AG Cooper painted as a “rogue prosecutor,” had violated just about every law, procedure, and ethical rule in his haste to convict, and thereby sacrifice, three innocent men — just to win reelection. Unchecked until late in the saga, Nifong began his misguided quest, before network TV cameras, by condemning the accused and predicting the future trial’s verdicts, and ended it by being caught concealing exculpatory evidence.

    Second, MSNBC and CBS Radio fired Don Imus, one of the most influential broadcasters in history, from his morning TV/radio show, after he had referred to black members of the Rutgers University women’s basketball team as “nappy-headed hos.”

    Wait. You’re confused already. You are wondering what sexist words Mr. Nifong uttered, aren’t you? That’s because you are a sexist. You forgot sexism’s definition: gender-based attitudes, conditions, and behaviors. You believe sexism pertains only to hurting and discriminating against women. As I pointed out in “Man-Hating DA Nifong Surrenders,” the rogue prosecutor thought nothing of sacrificing three  male students — because he suffers from a disease that afflicts many Americans: misandry.

    The Rutgers situation, albeit unacceptable, was, in reality, about invective and derived pain. Did Imus deserve to be fired? Probably. After all, he had made a career of constantly spewing racist, anti-Semitic, sexist garbage. But, at the end of the day, he is harmless — a nuisance on the airwaves whom one could have switched off. The understandably insulted basketball players, whose names I cannot recall, were bruised but not scarred for life — as some have claimed to be. Offended? Yes. Damaged? No. Potential employers never will find these women falsely associated with felony rape charges on Google.

    On the other hand, the landmark Duke rape case — a total travesty, crime, and miscarriage of justice — permanently besmirched and almost destroyed three college men and their families. The estimated legal bill for each student is $1 million. After learning of the allegations, Duke University threw them under the bus and forced the lacrosse coach to resign. Students and faculty alike lynched them with libelous posters and ads in the university newspaper. The major media organizations and feminist bloggers, in a hysterical frenzy, ensured that every human on the planet would know their names and faces.

    Judging by the overwhelming media coverage this week, America considers Don Imus’s verbal indiscretion and subsequent firing the primary news item. The day after the landmark Duke decision, my local paper, the San Jose Mercury News, used page six to summarize it. What was on the front page of that issue? The impending California drought. Now, what story do you suppose this same paper used to smother the front page today, given that CBS fired Imus yesterday? I needn’t answer that.

    Even though the outcome of the Duke rape case was a precedent-setting legal decision — giving a ray of hope to all men who have been and will continue to be falsely accused of rape — Jesse Jackson and Al Sharpton, the self-appointed, self-annointed popes of the black community, were totally silent. As was Nancy Grace, who, early on, had convicted the Duke students on her CNN program. Where were all the national politicians? Nowhere to be found. In the American Gynocracy, misandry is policy.

    It seems that the media complex will hover like angry hornets over any story, whether true or false, about a man wronging a woman. But, if a woman (teamed with a rogue prosecutor) harms a man — whether with her fists or with her lies — the reporters and their editors express a collective yawn.

    Last week, a “shielded” woman accused three University of Minnesota football players of rape. The accused men spent a weekend in jail and were released without ever being charged. The university, automatically presuming guilt, suspended them. As in the Duke case, their names and photos became public property. Why? Because they allegedly committed crimes. Drive-by allegations against men have become acceptable. Nobody, including any reporter covering the story, cares if the rape charges are bogus, that men are destroyed. Why? In a misandric culture, men have no value and are disposable.

    In 2006, when Mike Nifong was running for reelection as district attorney in Durham, North Carolina, most people in the town suspected that he had done something illegal in prosecuting the Duke students. He was an unknown prosecutor and likely to lose to his opponent, Freda Black. But, the Duke case give him instant celebrity, and the lynch-mob voters reelected him anyway. Why? Because most people fervently believe three things: 1) women who cry rape are always truthful; 2) men are built for sacrifice; 3) any politician running on a man-bad/woman-victim platform is honorable.

    To illustrate the misandric disease, let’s examine the caustic words of Rachel Marsden, a regular guest on Fox News Channel’s Red Eye with Greg Gutfeld. She made shockingly insensitive and deeply disturbing comments on that show within hours of the exoneration of the accused Duke men:

    “I just love how everybody is still talking like these guys’ lives are ruined. They put themselves up there as victims … by giving a press conference. They just go about their lives and say, ‘Glad that’s over; move on.’ How is the US ever going to win a war against anybody if its citizens are so delicate that allegations and name-calling can actually ruin their lives? What about these soldiers who are out there on the front lines, fighting a real war? These guys — they’re silver-spooners. They have trust funds coming out their ying-yangs. They’ll all be just fine.”

    When you really think about it, Ms. Marsden’s diatribe is significantly more offensive and dangerous than what Don Imus said. Yet, there have been no mass-protests, as there weren’t when Mike Nifong publicly executed the three Duke athletes without a trial. Ironically, Marsden is known in her native Canada as an admitted stalker — she pleaded guilty to criminally harassing a former Vancouver radio host — and for bringing questionable rape charges that destroyed the career and life of a university president. She already knew she could make such a sexist statement about the Duke men with impunity.

    The NoNonsense Bottom Line

    When the story is man-bad/woman-victim, there isn’t enough ink or satellite time to cover it. But, if that same story suddenly shifts to, or begins as, woman-bad/man-victim, a leading newspaper buries it on page six, and people focus on American Idol.

    Sexism affects men and women equally, but people don’t view it that way. As a result, men and fathers get the short end of the stick in reproduction, domestic violence, rape, marriage, divorce, child custody, child support, alimony, maternity fraud, and paternity fraud. Men are portrayed as morons and victims of “comedic” female violence on TV sitcoms and commercials. Without due process, men are publicly destroyed and thrown into jail like expendable pieces of meat.

    I have one question: What kind of society have we become?

    About the Author

    Marc H. Rudov is an internationally recognized author of 45+ articles and the books Under the Clitoral Hood: How to Crank Her Engine Without Cash, Booze, or Jumper Cables™ (ISBN 9780974501727), and The Man’s No-Nonsense Guide to Women: How to Succeed in Romance on Planet Earth™ (ISBN 0974501719).

    Rudov’s books, articles, blog, and podcasts are available at TheNoNonsenseMan.com.

    Copyright © 2007 by Marc H. Rudov. All rights reserved.


    2 Responses to “The Sexism of Imus and Nifong”

    1. arcoxia Says:

      arcoxia…

      This is a great article. I am new to your blog and i like what I see. I look forward to your future work.thanks for the tips. arcoxia if i made this at the beginning all the things were much easier….

    2. The No Nonsense Man » Blog Archive » Hillary Cannot Be President Says:

      [...] who falsely accuses a man of rape. You can’t. Remember Crystal Gail Mangum, who feloniously accused three Duke University lacrosse athletes of rape? They were totally innocent, and yet she’s a free woman. Outrageous. Which presidential [...]

    Leave a Reply

    You must be logged in to post a comment.